Coordination Compounds
Werner's Theory, Ligands & Coordination Number, IUPAC Nomenclature, Isomerism, Valence Bond Theory & Crystal Field Splitting
Topic 5.1: Werner's Theory of Coordination Compounds & Double Salts vs Complexes
Picture a crowded wedding hall in 1893. The groom sits inside the VIP stage surrounded closely by six bodyguards who never leave his side, while a few extra relatives stand outside near the exit gate. When a guest shakes hands at the gate, only the outside relatives greet them—the six VIP bodyguards stay locked around the groom! Back in 1898, Swiss chemist Alfred Werner realised cobalt chloride–ammonia compounds behave identically: only the outside Cl- counter-ions drop out as white AgCl precipitate when excess AgNO3 is added, while everything inside the square brackets [...] stays tightly bonded!
Coordination compounds are compounds in which a central metal atom or ion is bonded to a fixed number of anions or neutral molecules by sharing electron pairs. They are the backbone of biology—chlorophyll (Mg), haemoglobin (Fe), and vitamin B12 (Co) are all coordination compounds.
Werner's Postulates (1898, Nobel Prize 1913)
- Metals exhibit two types of linkages (valences): Primary valence and Secondary valence.
- Primary valences are normally ionisable and satisfied by negative ions (correspond to oxidation state).
- Secondary valences are non-ionisable, satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions, fixed for a metal, and equal to its Coordination Number.
- Groups bound by secondary linkages have characteristic spatial arrangements called coordination polyhedra (octahedral, tetrahedral, square planar).
| Empirical Formula & Colour | Modern Werner Formula | AgCl ppt per mol | Electrolyte Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoCl3·6NH3 (Yellow) | [Co(NH3)6]3+ 3Cl- | 3 mol AgCl | 1 : 3 electrolyte (4 ions) |
| CoCl3·5NH3 (Purple) | [CoCl(NH3)5]2+ 2Cl- | 2 mol AgCl | 1 : 2 electrolyte (3 ions) |
| CoCl3·4NH3 (Green) | [CoCl2(NH3)4]+ Cl- | 1 mol AgCl | 1 : 1 electrolyte (2 ions) |
| CoCl3·4NH3 (Violet) | [CoCl2(NH3)4]+ Cl- | 1 mol AgCl | 1 : 1 electrolyte (2 ions) |
•
PdCl2·4NH3 → 2 mol AgCl ⇒ [Pd(NH3)4]Cl2 ⇒ Secondary valence = 4•
NiCl2·6H2O → 2 mol AgCl ⇒ [Ni(H2O)6]Cl2 ⇒ Secondary valence = 6•
PtCl4·2HCl → 0 mol AgCl ⇒ H2[PtCl6] ⇒ Secondary valence = 6•
PtCl2·2NH3 → 0 mol AgCl ⇒ [PtCl2(NH3)2] ⇒ Secondary valence = 4
Double Salt vs Complex Compound
Both form by combining two or more stable compounds in stoichiometric ratio, but double salts like Carnallite (KCl·MgCl2·6H2O), Mohr's salt (FeSO4·(NH4)2SO4·6H2O), and Potash alum (KAl(SO4)2·12H2O) dissociate completely into simple ions in water. In contrast, complexes like K4[Fe(CN)6] keep the complex ion [Fe(CN)6]4- intact and do not give tests for Fe2+ or CN-!
CoCl3·5NH3, total Cl is 3, yet ONLY 2 mol AgCl precipitate because one Cl- sits inside the coordination bracket satisfying BOTH primary and secondary valence! Also remember: Mohr's salt tests positive for Fe2+, whereas K4[Fe(CN)6] does NOT.Topic 5.2: Key Definitions: Ligands, Denticity, Chelate Effect, Coordination Number & Polyhedra
Think of a central metal ion as a person holding hands in a circle. A unidentate ligand like Cl- or NH3 holds on with one hand. A didentate ligand like ethylenediamine (en) grabs the metal with both hands like a crab claw—literally chele in Greek! That two-handed crab grip makes chelate complexes dramatically harder to break apart. And EDTA4-? It's an octopus gripping the metal with six donor arms at once!
- Coordination Entity & Central Atom/Ion: Central metal atom/ion (a Lewis acid) bonded to a fixed number of ligands (Lewis bases), e.g. [CoCl3(NH3)3], [Fe(CN)6]4-.
- Coordination Sphere & Counter Ions: Central atom + ligands inside square brackets
[...]form the coordination sphere; ionisable species outside are counter ions (in K4[Fe(CN)6], counter ion is K+). - Classification of Ligands by Denticity (number of ligating donor atoms):
- Unidentate: 1 donor atom — Cl-, H2O, NH3, CN-, CO.
- Didentate: 2 donor atoms —
en(ethane-1,2-diamine, H2NCH2CH2NH2),C2O42-(oxalate). - Polydentate: Multiple donor atoms —
N(CH2CH2NH2)3; hexadentate EDTA4- binds via 2 N and 4 O atoms simultaneously.
- Chelate Ligand & Chelate Effect: When a di- or polydentate ligand binds through two or more donor atoms to a single metal ion forming a ring, it is a chelate ligand. Chelate complexes are far more stable than analogous complexes with unidentate ligands.
- Ambidentate Ligand: Has two different donor atoms, only one of which ligates at a time: NO2- (via N or O) and SCN- (via S or N).
Examples: [PtCl6]2- → CN = 6 | [Ni(NH3)4]2+ → CN = 4 | [Fe(C2O4)3]3- → CN = 3 × 2 = 6 | [Co(en)3]3+ → CN = 3 × 2 = 6
- Coordination Polyhedron: Spatial arrangement of directly attached donor atoms — Octahedral ([Co(NH3)6]3+), Tetrahedral ([Ni(CO)4]), Square Planar ([PtCl4]2-).
- Oxidation Number: Charge the central atom would carry if all ligands were removed with their shared electron pairs, written in Roman numerals: e.g. Cu(I) in [Cu(CN)4]3-.
- Homoleptic vs Heteroleptic: Only one kind of donor group = homoleptic ([Co(NH3)6]3+); more than one kind = heteroleptic ([Co(NH3)4Cl2]+).
[Co(en)3]3+ or [Fe(C2O4)3]3-, there are only 3 ligands, yet CN is 6 because each ligand is didentate (2 donor atoms). And remember: in EDTA4-, denticity = 6 (2 N + 4 O).Topic 5.3: IUPAC Nomenclature & Writing Formulas of Coordination Compounds
Think of naming a complex like introducing a royal visitor and then writing their passport formula—the two follow opposite outer steps, yet both sort guests alphabetically! When writing a formula, the metal king steps out first inside [...], followed by ligands alphabetically. When speaking the IUPAC name, the ligands introduce themselves alphabetically first, and if the complex bracket carries a negative charge, the metal takes a formal Latin-style -ate title like ferrate or argentate!
A. Rules for Writing Formulas (Mononuclear Entities)
- List the central atom first, followed by ligands in alphabetical order (regardless of charge; abbreviations use their first letter).
- Enclose polyatomic ligands and abbreviations in parentheses
(...); enclose the whole entity in square brackets[...]with no spaces inside. - If written without counter ion, show net charge as right superscript with number before sign:
[Co(CN)6]3-.
B. Rules for IUPAC Naming
- Name the cation first, then the anion (never add di/tri for counter ions outside brackets!).
- Inside the complex, name ligands in alphabetical order (ignoring prefixes di/tri/bis) BEFORE the central metal.
- Anionic ligands end in -ido / -o (
chlorido,cyanido,hydroxido,oxalato,carbonato,nitrito-N,thiocyanato-S). Neutral ligands keep their name EXCEPT: H2O = aqua, NH3 = ammine (double 'm'!), CO = carbonyl, NO = nitrosyl. - Use di, tri, tetra for simple ligands; use bis, tris, tetrakis (with ligand in parentheses) if the ligand name already contains a number (e.g.
bis(ethane-1,2-diamine),bis(triphenylphosphine)). - Write oxidation state as Roman numeral in parentheses immediately after the metal:
(0),(I),(II),(III). - If the complex ion is an anion, the metal ends in -ate (e.g. Fe → ferrate, Ag → argentate, Cu → cuprate, Zn → zincate, Co → cobaltate). Cationic & neutral complexes keep the regular English metal name!
1.
[Cr(NH3)3(H2O)3]Cl3 → triamminetriaquachromium(III) chloride2.
[Co(H2NCH2CH2NH2)3]2(SO4)3 → tris(ethane-1,2-diamine)cobalt(III) sulphate3.
[Ag(NH3)2][Ag(CN)2] → diamminesilver(I) dicyanidoargentate(I) (Notice silver vs argentate!)4.
K3[Cr(C2O4)3] → potassium trioxalatochromate(III)5.
Hg[Co(SCN)4] → mercury(I) tetrathiocyanato-S-cobaltate(III)6.
K2[Zn(OH)4] ← potassium tetrahydroxidozincate(II)
Topic 5.4: Isomerism: Structural (Linkage, Coordination, Ionisation, Solvate) & Stereoisomerism
Look at your left and right hands: identical thumb and four fingers, identical wrist joints—yet try sliding your right glove onto your left hand. It will never fit! Chemists call non-superimposable mirror-image pairs optical enantiomers. Meanwhile, sitting side-by-side at a square dining table versus sitting directly across each other gives cis and trans isomers—even tiny spatial swaps turn an ordinary platinum salt into the life-saving cancer drug cisplatin!
Isomers share the same chemical formula yet differ in physical or chemical properties.
A. Structural Isomerism (Different Bonds)
| Type | Origin | Classic NCERT Example Pair |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Linkage | Ambidentate ligand binds via two different donor atoms | [Co(NH3)5(NO2)]Cl2 (Yellow, N-bound) vs [Co(NH3)5(ONO)]Cl2 (Red, O-bound) |
| 2. Coordination | Ligand interchange between cationic & anionic metal spheres | [Co(NH3)6][Cr(CN)6] vs [Cr(NH3)6][Co(CN)6] |
| 3. Ionisation | Counter ion swaps with a ligand inside the sphere | [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Br (gives AgBr ppt with Ag+) vs [Co(NH3)5Br]SO4 (gives BaSO4 ppt with Ba2+) |
| 4. Solvate (Hydrate) | H2O bonded inside sphere vs free lattice crystal water | [Cr(H2O)6]Cl3 (Violet) vs [Cr(H2O)5Cl]Cl2·H2O (Grey-green) |
B. Stereoisomerism (Same Bonds, Different 3D Spatial Arrangement)
- 1. Geometrical Isomerism (CN 4 & 6):
- Square planar [MX2L2]: Adjacent (90°) = cis, opposite (180°) = trans, e.g.
[Pt(NH3)2Cl2]. Square planar[MABXL]gives 3 geometrical isomers (2 cis, 1 trans). - Tetrahedral [MX2L2]: Does NOT show geometrical isomerism because all 4 positions are symmetrically equivalent relative to each other!
- Octahedral [MX2L4] & [MX2(L-L)2]: cis (90°) vs trans (180°), e.g.
[Co(NH3)4Cl2]+,[CoCl2(en)2]+. - Octahedral [Ma3b3]: e.g.
[Co(NH3)3(NO2)3]shows facial (fac) (3 identical donors on one triangular face) and meridional (mer) (around a central meridian).
- Square planar [MX2L2]: Adjacent (90°) = cis, opposite (180°) = trans, e.g.
- 2. Optical Isomerism: Non-superimposable mirror images are called enantiomers (dextro, d rotates plane-polarised light right; laevo, l rotates left). Common in octahedral didentate chelates like
[Co(en)3]3+and[Cr(C2O4)3]3-.
[PtCl2(en)2]2+ or [CoCl2(en)2]+, only the cis form gives d and l optical isomers; the trans form has a plane of symmetry and is optically inactive.
[MX2(en)2], the cis form gives 2 optical isomers (d and l), whereas the trans form is optically INACTIVE—so total stereoisomers = 3 (cis-d, cis-l, trans), NOT 4!Topic 5.5.1 – 5.5.3: Valence Bond Theory (VBT): Inner vs Outer Orbital Hybridisation & Magnetic Behaviour
Imagine a hotel with five inner VIP suites (3d orbitals) and empty outer rooms (4s, 4p, 4d). When six aggressive guests (strong-field ligands like NH3 or CN-) arrive, they push the existing metal electrons to double up inside three 3d suites, freeing two inner 3d suites to build a tight d2sp3 inner-orbital complex! Mild guests (like F-) refuse to crowd anyone, so the metal spills out into the outer 4d annex to form a high-spin sp3d2 outer-orbital complex!
According to Valence Bond Theory (VBT), under the influence of ligands, a metal uses its (n-1)d, ns, np OR ns, np, nd orbitals for hybridisation, forming equivalent directional orbitals that overlap with filled ligand orbitals.
| Complex | Ion & Config | Hybridisation | Geometry | Unpaired e- & Magnetic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Co(NH3)6]3+ | Co3+ (3d6) | d2sp3 (Inner / Low spin) | Octahedral | n = 0 ⇒ Diamagnetic |
| [CoF6]3- | Co3+ (3d6) | sp3d2 (Outer / High spin) | Octahedral | n = 4 ⇒ Paramagnetic (4.90 BM) |
| [Ni(CN)4]2- | Ni2+ (3d8) | dsp2 (Inner / Low spin) | Square Planar | n = 0 ⇒ Diamagnetic |
| [NiCl4]2- | Ni2+ (3d8) | sp3 (High spin) | Tetrahedral | n = 2 ⇒ Paramagnetic (2.83 BM) |
| [Ni(CO)4] | Ni0 (3d84s2 → 3d10) | sp3 | Tetrahedral | n = 0 ⇒ Diamagnetic |
| [Fe(CN)6]3- | Fe3+ (3d5) | d2sp3 (Inner) | Octahedral | n = 1 ⇒ Weakly Paramagnetic (1.73 BM) |
| [FeF6]3- | Fe3+ (3d5) | sp3d2 (Outer) | Octahedral | n = 5 ⇒ Strongly Paramagnetic (5.92 BM) |
NCERT Example 5.7: [MnBr4]2- has μ = 5.9 BM ⇒ n = 5 unpaired e- ⇒ must be Tetrahedral (sp3) rather than square planar!
Limitations of Valence Bond Theory (5.5.3)
- Involves several assumptions; cannot give quantitative magnetic values.
- Does NOT explain the colour of coordination compounds.
- Cannot explain thermodynamic/kinetic stability or distinguish cleanly between weak and strong ligands.
- Cannot predict without magnetic data whether a 4-coordinate complex is tetrahedral (sp3) or square planar (dsp2).
[NiCl4]2- and [Ni(CO)4] are BOTH tetrahedral (sp3), yet [NiCl4]2- is paramagnetic (Ni2+ has 3d8 → 2 unpaired e-) whereas [Ni(CO)4] is diamagnetic (Ni0 pairs all 10 electrons into 3d10)! Also remember [Ni(NH3)6]2+ is outer orbital (sp3d2) because Ni2+ (d8) cannot vacate two 3d orbitals even if paired!Topic 5.5.4: Crystal Field Theory (CFT): Octahedral & Tetrahedral Splitting and Spectrochemical Series
Picture five identical d orbitals as five sleepy commuters sitting at the same energy level. Suddenly, six negatively charged ligands march straight down the x, y, and z axes to form an octahedron! Two axial orbitals (dx2-y2 and dz2) sit right in the path of oncoming ligands and suffer fierce electrostatic repulsion—shooting upward to become the eg set! Meanwhile, the three between-axis orbitals (dxy, dyz, dxz) dodge the traffic and drop safely to the lower t2g set!
Crystal Field Theory (CFT) is an electrostatic model treating ligands as point charges (anions) or point dipoles (neutral molecules). In an asymmetrical crystal field, the 5 degenerate d orbitals split!
A. Octahedral Crystal Field Splitting (Δo)
- Higher eg set (
dx2-y2, dz2, pointing along axes): energy rises by +(3/5) Δo (or +0.6 Δo). - Lower t2g set (
dxy, dyz, dxz, lying between axes): energy drops by -(2/5) Δo (or -0.4 Δo).
I- < Br- < SCN- < Cl- < S2- < F- < OH- < C2O42- < H2O < NCS- < edta4- < NH3 < en < CN- < CO
B. High-Spin vs Low-Spin (Δo vs Pairing Energy P)
For d1, d2, d3 ions, electrons enter t2g singly by Hund's rule. Starting at d4 (up to d7), two competing paths appear:
- Δo < P (Weak Field Ligand): Cheaper to jump to
egthan pay pairing energy P ⇒ t2g3 eg1 (for d4) → High-spin complex. - Δo > P (Strong Field Ligand): Cheaper to pair in
t2g⇒ t2g4 eg0 (for d4) → Low-spin complex.
C. Tetrahedral Crystal Field Splitting (Δt)
In a tetrahedral complex, splitting is inverted (e set is lower by -(3/5) Δt, t2 set is higher by +(2/5) Δt; note NO g subscript because a tetrahedron lacks a centre of symmetry!).
Topic 5.5.5 – 5.5.6: Colour in Coordination Compounds, d–d Transitions & Limitations of CFT
Why is a sapphire or copper sulphate crystal deep blue, while anhydrous CuSO4 powder turns boring white when heated? Picture white sunlight—all rainbow colours mixed together—shining into a vial of purple [Ti(H2O)6]3+. Its lone d electron snatches 498 nm blue-green photons to leap from t2g up to eg. What passes out to your eyes? Everything left over—bright, glowing complementary violet! Heat away the water ligands, the d–d jump disappears, and the crystal turns completely colourless!
When white light passes through a transition metal complex, a specific visible wavelength is absorbed to excite an electron from a lower d level to a higher d level (d–d transition). The observed colour is the complementary colour of the absorbed wavelength.
Classic Example: [Ti(H2O)6]3+ (Violet)
Ti3+ is a 3d1 system with ground state t2g1 eg0. Absorption of 498 nm (blue-green) light excites the electron: t2g1 eg0 → t2g0 eg1, making the solution look violet!
| Coordination Entity (Table 5.3) | λ Absorbed (nm) | Colour Absorbed | Observed Colour |
|---|---|---|---|
| [CoCl(NH3)5]2+ | 535 | Yellow | Violet |
| [Co(NH3)5(H2O)]3+ | 500 | Blue-Green | Red |
| [Co(NH3)6]3+ | 475 | Blue | Yellow-Orange |
| [Co(CN)6]3- | 310 (UV) | Ultraviolet | Pale Yellow |
| [Cu(H2O)4]2+ | 600 | Red | Blue |
| [Ti(H2O)6]3+ | 498 | Blue-Green | Violet |
[Ni(H2O)6]2+ with stronger en ligands increases Δo, shifting absorption to shorter wavelengths and shifting colour smoothly:[Ni(H2O)6]2+ (Green) → [Ni(H2O)4(en)]2+ (Pale Blue) → [Ni(H2O)2(en)2]2+ (Blue/Purple) → [Ni(en)3]2+ (Violet).Gemstones: Both Ruby (Cr3+ in Al2O3) and Emerald (Cr3+ in beryl Be3Al2Si6O18) owe their vivid colours to d–d transitions of Cr3+ (d3) in different host crystal fields!
Limitations of Crystal Field Theory (5.5.6)
- Treating ligands strictly as negative point charges wrongly predicts that anionic ligands should exert the largest Δo—yet in reality anions sit at the weak end of the spectrochemical series!
- It ignores the covalent character of metal–ligand bonding (addressed later by Ligand Field Theory & MOT).
[Ti(H2O)6]Cl3 or blue CuSO4·5H2O turns them colourless/white because removing ligands removes crystal field splitting! (2) Wavelength absorbed is inversely proportional to Δo (E = hc/λ), so stronger ligand ⇒ larger Δo ⇒ SHORTER λ absorbed: thus λabs order is [Ni(NO2)6]4- < [Ni(NH3)6]2+ < [Ni(H2O)6]2+!Topic 5.6 – 5.7: Metal Carbonyls (Synergic Bonding) & Applications in Biology, Medicine and Industry
Picture a two-way friendship handshake between a metal atom and carbon monoxide (CO). First, CO hands a lone pair of electrons from carbon into a vacant metal orbital to form a strong σ bond. Immediately, the electron-rich metal returns the favour by pushing electrons from its filled d orbitals back into the empty π* antibonding orbital of CO! That mutual give-and-take—synergic bonding—locks CO onto zero-valent metals so tightly that Mond's nickel refinery and haemoglobin oxygen transport rely on similar metal–ligand chemistry!
A. Homoleptic Metal Carbonyls & Synergic Bonding (5.6)
Transition metals in zero oxidation state form well-defined homoleptic carbonyls: [Ni(CO)4] (Tetrahedral), [Fe(CO)5] (Trigonal bipyramidal), [Cr(CO)6] (Octahedral), [Mn2(CO)10] (two square-pyramidal Mn(CO)5 units joined by a Mn–Mn bond), and [Co2(CO)8] (Co–Co bond bridged by two CO groups).
• M–C σ bond: Donation of lone pair from carbonyl carbon into a vacant metal orbital.
• M–C π bond (Back-bonding): Donation of an electron pair from a filled metal d orbital into the vacant antibonding π* orbital of CO.
Result: Mutual reinforcement (synergic effect) strengthens the M–C bond!
B. High-Yield Applications of Coordination Compounds (5.7)
| Field | Coordination Compound / Ligand & Specific Role |
|---|---|
| Biological Systems | Chlorophyll (Mg, photosynthesis); Haemoglobin (Fe, oxygen carrier); Vitamin B12 / cyanocobalamin (Co, anti-pernicious anaemia); enzymes carboxypeptidase A & carbonic anhydrase. |
| Medicinal Chemistry | cis-platin (cis-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2]) inhibits tumour growth; EDTA treats lead poisoning; D-penicillamine & desferrioxime B remove excess toxic Cu/Fe via chelate therapy. |
| Analytical Chemistry | Na2EDTA titration estimates hardness of water (Ca2+ & Mg2+); DMG (for Ni2+), α-nitroso-β-naphthol, cupron detect metal ions. |
| Metallurgy & Refining | Gold & Silver extraction via cyanide complex [Au(CN)2]- displaced by Zn; Nickel purification via volatile [Ni(CO)4] (Mond process). |
| Catalysis & Photography | Wilkinson catalyst [(Ph3P)3RhCl] hydrogenates alkenes; Black & white film fixing uses hypo (Na2S2O3) dissolving AgBr as [Ag(S2O3)2]3-; smooth Ag/Au electroplating from [Ag(CN)2]- and [Au(CN)2]-. |
Solved Previous Year Questions (Kerala DHSE & NCERT)
Q1 (Kerala HSE March (Repeated Favorite) • 3 Marks): Using Valence Bond Theory, explain why [Ni(CN)4]2- is square planar and diamagnetic while [NiCl4]2- is tetrahedral and paramagnetic.
In both ions, Ni is in +2 oxidation state (3d8) with 2 unpaired electrons in free Ni2+.
- [Ni(CN)4]2-: Strong-field CN- forces pairing of the two unpaired 3d electrons, vacating one 3d orbital for dsp2 hybridisation (Square Planar). Since n = 0, it is diamagnetic.
- [NiCl4]2-: Weak-field Cl- does not pair 3d electrons, so one 4s and three 4p orbitals undergo sp3 hybridisation (Tetrahedral). Two unpaired electrons remain (n = 2), making it paramagnetic (μ = 2.83 BM).
Q2 (Kerala HSE SAY / NCERT • 2 Marks): Draw a neat energy-level diagram showing the splitting of d orbitals in an octahedral crystal field. Give the energies of the split sets relative to the barycentre.
In an octahedral field, the 5 degenerate d orbitals split into two sets:
- eg set (dx2-y2, dz2): Point directly along the axes toward ligands → raised in energy by +(3/5) Δo (+0.6 Δo).
- t2g set (dxy, dyz, dxz): Lie between the axes → lowered in energy by -(2/5) Δo (-0.4 Δo).
The total energy separation between t2g and eg is Δo.
Q3 (Kerala HSE March • 2 Marks): Write the IUPAC names of: (a) [CoCl2(en)2]Cl (b) K3[Fe(C2O4)3] (c) [Pt(NH3)2Cl(NO2)] (d) [Ni(CO)4]
- (a) dichloridobis(ethane-1,2-diamine)cobalt(III) chloride
- (b) potassium trioxalatoferrate(III)
- (c) diamminechloridonitrito-N-platinum(II)
- (d) tetracarbonylnickel(0)
Q4 (Kerala HSE Model / NCERT • 2 Marks): How many moles of AgCl are precipitated when 1 mole of CoCl3·6NH3 and 1 mole of CoCl3·4NH3 are separately treated with excess AgNO3? Write their modern Werner formulas.
CoCl3·6NH3→ [Co(NH3)6]Cl3 → gives 3 mol AgCl (3 ionisable Cl- counter-ions).CoCl3·4NH3→ [CoCl2(NH3)4]Cl → gives 1 mol AgCl (2 Cl- satisfy secondary valence inside brackets; only 1 Cl- is ionisable).
Q5 (Kerala HSE March (High Yield) • 3 Marks): Draw the geometrical isomers of [Pt(NH3)2Cl2] and [Co(NH3)3(NO2)3]. Which isomer of [Pt(NH3)2Cl2] is used in cancer treatment?
[Pt(NH3)2Cl2] (Square planar): Exists as cis (two Cl- adjacent at 90°) and trans (two Cl- opposite at 180°). The cis-isomer (cis-platin) inhibits tumour growth in chemotherapy.
[Co(NH3)3(NO2)3] (Octahedral Ma3b3): Exists as facial (fac) (three identical ligands at corners of one octahedral triangular face) and meridional (mer) (around a meridian plane of the octahedron).
Q6 (Kerala HSE SAY • 2 Marks): Out of cis-[CrCl2(ox)2]3- and trans-[CrCl2(ox)2]3-, which one is optically active (chiral)? Give reason.
cis-[CrCl2(ox)2]3- is optically active (chiral) because it lacks a plane of symmetry and forms a non-superimposable mirror-image pair (d and l enantiomers). The trans isomer possesses a plane of symmetry and is superimposable on its mirror image (achiral).
Q7 (Kerala HSE March • 2 Marks): Explain why [Ti(H2O)6]3+ is violet in colour while it becomes colourless upon heating.
In [Ti(H2O)6]3+, Ti3+ has a 3d1 configuration (t2g1 eg0). When blue-green light (498 nm) is absorbed, the electron undergoes a d–d transition to eg1, causing the solution to transmit complementary violet colour.
Upon heating, H2O ligands are lost; crystal field splitting disappears (Δo = 0), so no d–d transition occurs and the substance turns colourless.
Q8 (Kerala HSE / NCERT Intext 5.4 • 2 Marks): Give chemical test evidence to prove that [Co(NH3)5Br]SO4 and [Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Br are ionisation isomers.
They give different ions in aqueous solution:
[Co(NH3)5Br]SO4yields SO42- → gives a white precipitate of BaSO4 with BaCl2, and no precipitate with AgNO3.[Co(NH3)5(SO4)]Bryields Br- → gives a pale-yellow precipitate of AgBr with AgNO3, and no precipitate with BaCl2.
Q9 (Kerala HSE March • 2 Marks): Explain the nature of bonding in metal carbonyls with a labelled interaction scheme.
The metal–carbon bond in metal carbonyls has both σ and π character (synergic bonding):
- M–C σ bond: Formed by donation of the lone pair on the carbonyl carbon into a vacant orbital of the metal.
- M–C π bond: Formed by donation of an electron pair from a filled d orbital of the metal into the vacant antibonding π* orbital of CO.
This mutual metal–ligand interaction produces a synergic effect that strengthens the M–C bond.
Q10 (Kerala HSE Improvement • 2 Marks): What is meant by (a) Ambidentate ligand and (b) Chelate effect? Give one example of each.
- (a) Ambidentate ligand: A unidentate ligand having two different donor atoms, either of which can coordinate to the metal at a time. Examples:
NO2-(via N or O) andSCN-(via S or N). - (b) Chelate effect: Enhanced stability of complexes formed by di- or polydentate chelating ligands forming closed rings compared to analogous complexes with unidentate ligands. Example:
[Fe(C2O4)3]3-or[Co(en)3]3+.
Q11 (Kerala HSE March • 1 Marks): Name the central metal ions present in: (a) Chlorophyll (b) Haemoglobin (c) Vitamin B12.
(a) Chlorophyll: Magnesium (Mg) | (b) Haemoglobin: Iron (Fe) | (c) Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin): Cobalt (Co).
Q12 (Kerala HSE SAY / NCERT Ex 5.1 • 1 Marks): FeSO4 mixed with (NH4)2SO4 (1:1) gives the test for Fe2+ ion, whereas CuSO4 mixed with aqueous NH3 (1:4) does not give the test for Cu2+ ion. Why?
FeSO4·(NH4)2SO4·6H2O (Mohr's salt) is a double salt that dissociates completely into free Fe2+, NH4+, and SO42- ions in water. In contrast, CuSO4 + 4NH3 forms the coordination complex [Cu(NH3)4]SO4; its complex ion [Cu(NH3)4]2+ does not dissociate into free Cu2+ ions.